PANSS and Cognition Change in D-Cycloserine Compination Treatment of Schizophrenia / 대한정신약물학회지

OBJECTIVE: Recently, there are many reports that glutamate receptors have close relationships with a pathophysiology of schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of D-cycloserine, which is glycine site partial agonist in NMDA receptor on psychopathologic symptoms and cognitive functions. METHODS: This study was done for chronic schizophrenic inpatients taking typical antipsychotics for more than 4 months. Exclusion criteria were patients with over 8 points according to Simpson-Angus scale for EPS or those with over 17 points of Hamilton Depression Scale. Patients were randomized to classify into two groups; D-cycloserine group (n=13) and placebo group (n=13). Each group received D-cycloserine 100 mg or placebo separately for 8 weeks. Psychopathology was evaluated with PANSS at baseline, 2nd week, fourth week and eighth week. Cognitive function was evaluated with KWIS at baseline and eighth week. RESULTS: Total 26 patients completed this trial. The average period of morbidity was 10.39+/-3.87 years and the average doses of antipsychotic was 1228.35+/-720.30 mg based on chlorpromazine equivalent. In positive subscale, negative subscale, general psychopathology subscale, total PANSS scale and KWIS, there were no significant differences between D-cycloserine and placebo groups. However, negative subscale scores had decreased from 24.92+/-3.64 (Baseline) to 23.46+/-3.41 (week 8) (p=0.077). CONCLUSION: There were no clear changes in positive symptom, negative symptom, memory, language function, and performance intelligence when D-cycloserine 100 mg was given with antipsychotic medication. However, some patients showed clear improvement in negative symptom, especially blunted affect. Therefore, D-cycloserine combination therapy could be effective for negative symptom. In future, study that can show effectiveness in psychopathology and cognitive function according to drug dosage is needed.

Cost Effectiveness of Clozapine and Risperidone in

OBJECTIVES: Risperidone and clozapine beling to a new generation of antipsychotics that are reportedly more effective and better tolerated than conventional neuroleptics. However, each of these agents costs far more per unit than conventional neuroletics. The purpose of our retrospective study was to ascertain the total cost and effectiveness of treatment before and after administration of risperidone and clozapine in 'revolving door' schizophrenia patients. METHOD: Data collected on revolving door schizophrenics for 2 years before clozapine and risperidone treatment and for at least 2 years after clozapine and risperidone treatment. Direct cost of inpatient and outpatient treatment was measured. Effectiveness was scaled as 'years of mild disability gained'. RESULT: Both risperidone and cloazpine result in higher costs and additional benefits to patients, for example, increased mild disability, reduced number of relapse, and reduced hospital length-of-stay. An ICER of risperidone was less than Rc and ICER of clozapine was greater than Rc. According to decision-analytic this model, risperidone had favorable cost-effectivenss ratios relative to clozapine. CONCLUSION: We have assumed that risperidone is more cost-effective than clozapine.